<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 160 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343889</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeals due to non-compliance with the stay order. Despite the applicant&#039;s payment of tax liability and financial difficulties, the Tribunal found no legal basis to entertain a Misc. Application for restoration, considering previous legal challenges and dismissals by higher courts. The Tribunal concluded that the applicant&#039;s actions caused prejudice to the Revenue, leading to the dismissal of appeals. Emphasizing adherence to higher court rulings, the Tribunal upheld the dismissals, highlighting the lack of grounds for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 160 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343889</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeals due to non-compliance with the stay order. Despite the applicant&#039;s payment of tax liability and financial difficulties, the Tribunal found no legal basis to entertain a Misc. Application for restoration, considering previous legal challenges and dismissals by higher courts. The Tribunal concluded that the applicant&#039;s actions caused prejudice to the Revenue, leading to the dismissal of appeals. Emphasizing adherence to higher court rulings, the Tribunal upheld the dismissals, highlighting the lack of grounds for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>