https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343883 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. A nominal penalty of Rs. 5,000 was imposed under Rule 15 of CCR, 2004, absolving the appellant from interest and penalty liabilities. The decision aligned with established legal principles, emphasizing correct application of CENVAT credit rules, consideration of revised assessable values, and adherence to legal precedents in determining eligibility and penalty imposition. en-us Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343883 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. A nominal penalty of Rs. 5,000 was imposed under Rule 15 of CCR, 2004, absolving the appellant from interest and penalty liabilities. The decision aligned with established legal principles, emphasizing correct application of CENVAT credit rules, consideration of revised assessable values, and adherence to legal precedents in determining eligibility and penalty imposition. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343883