https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343879 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appellant's appeal against the rejection of their appeal concerning differential duty payment and interest calculation. The Tribunal considered relevant judgments of higher courts, including the High Court and Supreme Court, and various Tribunal decisions, such as Toyota Kirloskar case. Relying on legal interpretations and precedents, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's decision, emphasizing the liability to pay interest on duty shortfalls after final assessment. The appellant's argument on interest payment was supported by established case law, resulting in the appeal being allowed with consequential relief. en-us Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jun 2017 06:23:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343879 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appellant's appeal against the rejection of their appeal concerning differential duty payment and interest calculation. The Tribunal considered relevant judgments of higher courts, including the High Court and Supreme Court, and various Tribunal decisions, such as Toyota Kirloskar case. Relying on legal interpretations and precedents, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's decision, emphasizing the liability to pay interest on duty shortfalls after final assessment. The appellant's argument on interest payment was supported by established case law, resulting in the appeal being allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343879