<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment proceeding under sections 147/148 and delete the addition of Rs. 70,77,000 as unexplained investment treated as deemed income under section 69B. The Tribunal found that the reassessment was not justified as there were no new facts or material to support it, and the addition of unexplained investment lacked evidence. The decision was rendered on 17th May 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2017 06:20:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment proceeding under sections 147/148 and delete the addition of Rs. 70,77,000 as unexplained investment treated as deemed income under section 69B. The Tribunal found that the reassessment was not justified as there were no new facts or material to support it, and the addition of unexplained investment lacked evidence. The decision was rendered on 17th May 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>