<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 122 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343851</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, remitting the case to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The ITAT emphasized the need for reevaluation of the claim for capital gains tax exemption on the agricultural land sold based on its distance from the Corporation limit. The decision was issued on April 26, 2017, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2017 06:20:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 122 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343851</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, remitting the case to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The ITAT emphasized the need for reevaluation of the claim for capital gains tax exemption on the agricultural land sold based on its distance from the Corporation limit. The decision was issued on April 26, 2017, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>