https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192475 Where a recognised political party splits into rival groups each claiming the same reserved symbol, the Election Commission may decide which group is entitled to it by examining all relevant facts under paragraph 15 of the Symbols Order. That power was treated as consistent with Article 324 and the election scheme, and not as an unconstitutional excess or invalid delegation. On the facts, the majority and numerical strength test was held to be a valid measure of support, and the group with substantial majority backing was treated as entitled to the reserved symbol. The reserved symbol was also regarded as an election right, not divisible property. en-us Thu, 11 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Jun 2017 16:39:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192475 Where a recognised political party splits into rival groups each claiming the same reserved symbol, the Election Commission may decide which group is entitled to it by examining all relevant facts under paragraph 15 of the Symbols Order. That power was treated as consistent with Article 324 and the election scheme, and not as an unconstitutional excess or invalid delegation. On the facts, the majority and numerical strength test was held to be a valid measure of support, and the group with substantial majority backing was treated as entitled to the reserved symbol. The reserved symbol was also regarded as an election right, not divisible property. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192475