<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 77 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 13,00,000 as unexplained cash credit due to insufficient evidence provided by the Assessee regarding cash deposits by loan creditors. However, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000 after finding the documentation submitted by the Assessee satisfactory in proving the genuineness of the transaction. As a result, the Assessee received partial relief with the appeal being partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 06:15:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 77 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 13,00,000 as unexplained cash credit due to insufficient evidence provided by the Assessee regarding cash deposits by loan creditors. However, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 10,00,000 after finding the documentation submitted by the Assessee satisfactory in proving the genuineness of the transaction. As a result, the Assessee received partial relief with the appeal being partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>