<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 75 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat profits from share transactions as business income instead of short term capital gains. Emphasizing the profit motive, volume, frequency, and regularity of transactions, the Tribunal concluded that the activities indicated a business motive. The judgment highlighted the finality of the order under section 263 and classified the income as &#039;Profits and gains of business or profession,&#039; dismissing the appellant&#039;s argument for capital gains treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 06:15:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 75 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat profits from share transactions as business income instead of short term capital gains. Emphasizing the profit motive, volume, frequency, and regularity of transactions, the Tribunal concluded that the activities indicated a business motive. The judgment highlighted the finality of the order under section 263 and classified the income as &#039;Profits and gains of business or profession,&#039; dismissing the appellant&#039;s argument for capital gains treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>