<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 71 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343800</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning previous decisions, and permitted the appellant to carry forward the business loss. The ITAT considered the appellant&#039;s minimal involvement in day-to-day transactions through PMS and treated profit and loss from PMS accounts as capital loss, emphasizing that late filing of the return should not be the sole criterion for rejecting the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 71 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343800</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning previous decisions, and permitted the appellant to carry forward the business loss. The ITAT considered the appellant&#039;s minimal involvement in day-to-day transactions through PMS and treated profit and loss from PMS accounts as capital loss, emphasizing that late filing of the return should not be the sole criterion for rejecting the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>