<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 62 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343791</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by restricting the disallowance under Section 14A to Rs. 17,50,000. The revenue&#039;s appeal on the same issue was dismissed. The ITAT affirmed the treatment of rental income as &quot;Income from House Property.&quot; The ITAT&#039;s decision was pronounced on April 12, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 62 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343791</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by restricting the disallowance under Section 14A to Rs. 17,50,000. The revenue&#039;s appeal on the same issue was dismissed. The ITAT affirmed the treatment of rental income as &quot;Income from House Property.&quot; The ITAT&#039;s decision was pronounced on April 12, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>