<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (2) TMI 65 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192452</link>
    <description>Commission credited in India to a non-resident&#039;s account was treated as receipt in India for income-tax purposes, even though the services giving rise to the commission were performed abroad and the amount was not physically remitted overseas. Section 4(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, was applied to hold the commission taxable in India. The assessee was also held liable as statutory agent of the non-resident because a business connection existed and section 43 operated as an independent machinery provision, not confined to section 42. The result was that the commission was taxable in India and the assessee was assessable as agent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:56:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (2) TMI 65 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192452</link>
      <description>Commission credited in India to a non-resident&#039;s account was treated as receipt in India for income-tax purposes, even though the services giving rise to the commission were performed abroad and the amount was not physically remitted overseas. Section 4(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, was applied to hold the commission taxable in India. The assessee was also held liable as statutory agent of the non-resident because a business connection existed and section 43 operated as an independent machinery provision, not confined to section 42. The result was that the commission was taxable in India and the assessee was assessable as agent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>