https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192440 Preventive detention may be sustained even where the detenu is already in judicial custody if the authority has cogent material showing likely release on bail and a real need to prevent future prejudicial activity. The material indicates that custody alone does not defeat detention where subjective satisfaction is properly formed on the facts. Only documents actually relied upon by the detaining authority need be supplied for an effective representation under Article 22(5); incidental or unrelated documents need not be furnished. Delay in issuing the detention order or in dealing with the representation will not invalidate detention where a satisfactory explanation is shown. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jun 2017 14:17:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192440 Preventive detention may be sustained even where the detenu is already in judicial custody if the authority has cogent material showing likely release on bail and a real need to prevent future prejudicial activity. The material indicates that custody alone does not defeat detention where subjective satisfaction is properly formed on the facts. Only documents actually relied upon by the detaining authority need be supplied for an effective representation under Article 22(5); incidental or unrelated documents need not be furnished. Delay in issuing the detention order or in dealing with the representation will not invalidate detention where a satisfactory explanation is shown. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 17 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192440