<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 56 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision confirming the service tax liability on charges for painting and upkeep of gas cylinders, categorizing them under management, maintenance, or repair services. The appellant&#039;s claim for abatement under notification no. 12/2003-ST was rejected, with emphasis on the notification requirements for exemption of goods&#039; value. The Tribunal also affirmed penalties imposed, stating that the services provided fell within taxable categories. The appellant&#039;s argument on Works Contract tax deduction lacked supporting evidence, leading to the dismissal of appeals and upholding of the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 56 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision confirming the service tax liability on charges for painting and upkeep of gas cylinders, categorizing them under management, maintenance, or repair services. The appellant&#039;s claim for abatement under notification no. 12/2003-ST was rejected, with emphasis on the notification requirements for exemption of goods&#039; value. The Tribunal also affirmed penalties imposed, stating that the services provided fell within taxable categories. The appellant&#039;s argument on Works Contract tax deduction lacked supporting evidence, leading to the dismissal of appeals and upholding of the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>