<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 55 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on advances received by the appellant, emphasizing compliance with Section 67(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. Additionally, the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 were affirmed, except for a specified period where the penalty under Section 76 was set aside based on the proviso added to Section 78.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 55 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on advances received by the appellant, emphasizing compliance with Section 67(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. Additionally, the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 were affirmed, except for a specified period where the penalty under Section 76 was set aside based on the proviso added to Section 78.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>