https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343782 The Tribunal, through S. S. Garg, dismissed the application seeking condonation of a 948-day delay in filing an appeal against Order-in-Appeal No.156/2013 dated 2.4.2013 by the Commissioner of Central Excise (A), Bangalore. The appellant's claim of non-receipt of the order was deemed insufficient justification for the delay. Despite arguments from the appellant's counsel, citing relevant legal precedents, the Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of timely appeals and the need for valid reasons for any delay in legal proceedings. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:25:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343782 The Tribunal, through S. S. Garg, dismissed the application seeking condonation of a 948-day delay in filing an appeal against Order-in-Appeal No.156/2013 dated 2.4.2013 by the Commissioner of Central Excise (A), Bangalore. The appellant's claim of non-receipt of the order was deemed insufficient justification for the delay. Despite arguments from the appellant's counsel, citing relevant legal precedents, the Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of timely appeals and the need for valid reasons for any delay in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343782