<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 47 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343776</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD upheld the respondent-assessee&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat credit for the purchase of raw material from M/s M.K. Steels. The Tribunal found that the respondent had received the goods with proper documentation and had taken reasonable steps to ensure duty payment on inputs. Relying on legal precedents and Rule 9(3) of the Rules of 2004, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and granted consequential benefits to the respondent-assessee, aligning with the principle that an assessee must take reasonable steps to confirm duty payment without undue burden.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 47 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343776</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD upheld the respondent-assessee&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat credit for the purchase of raw material from M/s M.K. Steels. The Tribunal found that the respondent had received the goods with proper documentation and had taken reasonable steps to ensure duty payment on inputs. Relying on legal precedents and Rule 9(3) of the Rules of 2004, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and granted consequential benefits to the respondent-assessee, aligning with the principle that an assessee must take reasonable steps to confirm duty payment without undue burden.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>