<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 43 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343772</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was admissible on front end loader, vacuum pump and crane spares because the items fell under Chapter 84 and were used in the manufacturing process. Rule 57Q(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, read with its Explanation, treated such goods as capital goods unless they were covered by express exclusions, and these disputed items did not fall within any excluded category. Credit could therefore not be denied on the stated facts. The order disallowing credit was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 43 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343772</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was admissible on front end loader, vacuum pump and crane spares because the items fell under Chapter 84 and were used in the manufacturing process. Rule 57Q(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, read with its Explanation, treated such goods as capital goods unless they were covered by express exclusions, and these disputed items did not fall within any excluded category. Credit could therefore not be denied on the stated facts. The order disallowing credit was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>