<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 39 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343768</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the appeals to the original authority for reconsideration of the refund claims in light of favorable eligibility determinations from previous decisions and after following due process of law. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the need for a thorough review based on the established eligibility of the appellant for CENVAT credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 39 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343768</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the appeals to the original authority for reconsideration of the refund claims in light of favorable eligibility determinations from previous decisions and after following due process of law. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the need for a thorough review based on the established eligibility of the appellant for CENVAT credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>