<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 34 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343763</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;Magistrate&quot; in Section 110(1B) and Section 110(1C) of the Customs Act, 1962 was construed to mean an Executive Magistrate. The court reasoned that the functions under these provisions are limited to certifying the inventory of seized goods and permitting photographs or representative samples, without any adjudication of rights, appreciation of evidence, or exposure to punishment, penalty, custody or trial. Read with Section 3(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, these powers are administrative or executive in nature, and the presence of Section 110-A supports their investigative character. The petition was accordingly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:24:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 34 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343763</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;Magistrate&quot; in Section 110(1B) and Section 110(1C) of the Customs Act, 1962 was construed to mean an Executive Magistrate. The court reasoned that the functions under these provisions are limited to certifying the inventory of seized goods and permitting photographs or representative samples, without any adjudication of rights, appreciation of evidence, or exposure to punishment, penalty, custody or trial. Read with Section 3(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, these powers are administrative or executive in nature, and the presence of Section 110-A supports their investigative character. The petition was accordingly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>