<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 31 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343760</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court clarified that DRI officers were not proper officers under the Customs Act, leading to amendments. Different High Courts had conflicting views on DRI officers&#039; jurisdiction, with the Delhi High Court holding that the amendment did not apply retroactively. However, the Supreme Court stayed this decision. The Mumbai High Court and the High Court of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh had differing opinions. The Tribunal decided to set aside orders and remand cases to the original authority for reevaluation in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s decisions, ultimately allowing the appeal by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:23:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 31 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343760</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court clarified that DRI officers were not proper officers under the Customs Act, leading to amendments. Different High Courts had conflicting views on DRI officers&#039; jurisdiction, with the Delhi High Court holding that the amendment did not apply retroactively. However, the Supreme Court stayed this decision. The Mumbai High Court and the High Court of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh had differing opinions. The Tribunal decided to set aside orders and remand cases to the original authority for reevaluation in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s decisions, ultimately allowing the appeal by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>