<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 18 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343747</link>
    <description>In IMFL business, profit estimation was confined to 5% of purchases because the Tribunal followed a coordinate bench view that this margin was reasonable on the facts, and rejected the higher estimate adopted below. The assessee also failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of two unsecured loan creditors, and confirmations alone were held insufficient, so the related additions as unexplained credits were sustained. The appeal therefore succeeded only on business-income estimation and failed on the loan issue, giving the assessee partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:22:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 18 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343747</link>
      <description>In IMFL business, profit estimation was confined to 5% of purchases because the Tribunal followed a coordinate bench view that this margin was reasonable on the facts, and rejected the higher estimate adopted below. The assessee also failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of two unsecured loan creditors, and confirmations alone were held insufficient, so the related additions as unexplained credits were sustained. The appeal therefore succeeded only on business-income estimation and failed on the loan issue, giving the assessee partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>