<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 16 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the conduct did not amount to contumacious behavior justifying the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and concealment of income. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleted the penalty levy, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:22:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 16 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the conduct did not amount to contumacious behavior justifying the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and concealment of income. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleted the penalty levy, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>