<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 8 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343737</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, including treating speculation loss as a business loss, not adding unexplained capital introduced by partners, justifying foreign travel expenses, reconciling TDS for labour charges, and justifying the rise in labour expenses despite a fall in turnover. The decision was pronounced on 25-04-2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:21:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 8 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343737</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, including treating speculation loss as a business loss, not adding unexplained capital introduced by partners, justifying foreign travel expenses, reconciling TDS for labour charges, and justifying the rise in labour expenses despite a fall in turnover. The decision was pronounced on 25-04-2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>