<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1079 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192422</link>
    <description>The judgment clarified that Bagasse, as a residue of sugarcane crushing, does not attract duty under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The decisions of the High Court and Tribunal supported this interpretation, emphasizing the nature of Bagasse as waste and the impracticality of segregating inputs at the crushing stage. The impugned orders were overturned, and the appeals were allowed based on the settled legal position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 11:41:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1079 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192422</link>
      <description>The judgment clarified that Bagasse, as a residue of sugarcane crushing, does not attract duty under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The decisions of the High Court and Tribunal supported this interpretation, emphasizing the nature of Bagasse as waste and the impracticality of segregating inputs at the crushing stage. The impugned orders were overturned, and the appeals were allowed based on the settled legal position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>