<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1467 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343729</link>
    <description>The court refrained from deciding on disputed facts regarding notice issuance and service in the writ petition challenging the recovery of service tax. It directed the appellate authority to review the matter, consider the petitioner&#039;s claims, and determine the limitation period for appeal. The petitioner was granted the liberty to approach the court if unsatisfied after exhausting available remedies following the appellate authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 07:02:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1467 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343729</link>
      <description>The court refrained from deciding on disputed facts regarding notice issuance and service in the writ petition challenging the recovery of service tax. It directed the appellate authority to review the matter, consider the petitioner&#039;s claims, and determine the limitation period for appeal. The petitioner was granted the liberty to approach the court if unsatisfied after exhausting available remedies following the appellate authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>