<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1464 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343726</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessees&#039; appeal and dismissed the department&#039;s appeal. It held that reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses should not be included in the taxable value of services, aligning with previous judgments. Penalties under section 78 were also deemed unwarranted. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting consequential reliefs to the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1464 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343726</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessees&#039; appeal and dismissed the department&#039;s appeal. It held that reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses should not be included in the taxable value of services, aligning with previous judgments. Penalties under section 78 were also deemed unwarranted. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting consequential reliefs to the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>