<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1460 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343722</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the need to verify the appellant&#039;s claim of non-availment of cenvat credit to determine eligibility for exemption under Notification No.12/2003-ST for service tax on materials supplied during service. The penalty under Section 76 was set aside, providing relief to the appellant based on separate billing of charges and the requirement for further verification of cenvat credit status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 07:02:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1460 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343722</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the need to verify the appellant&#039;s claim of non-availment of cenvat credit to determine eligibility for exemption under Notification No.12/2003-ST for service tax on materials supplied during service. The penalty under Section 76 was set aside, providing relief to the appellant based on separate billing of charges and the requirement for further verification of cenvat credit status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>