https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343713 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)'s order, ruling in favor of the assessee in the dispute over duty payment on compost manure. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, stating that compost was not subject to duty under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules. The decision was based on the lack of grounds to challenge the Commissioner (A)'s order and established legal principles regarding the nature of compost as a non-excisable product. en-us Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343713 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)'s order, ruling in favor of the assessee in the dispute over duty payment on compost manure. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, stating that compost was not subject to duty under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules. The decision was based on the lack of grounds to challenge the Commissioner (A)'s order and established legal principles regarding the nature of compost as a non-excisable product. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343713