<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1428 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343690</link>
    <description>Reopening an assessment under section 147/148 requires specific, verifiable reasons linking tangible material to a formed belief that income escaped assessment; the recorded reasons here were vague conclusions and therefore inadequate, so reopening was invalidated. Reasons of belief must state facts, their source and demonstrate independent evaluation; because the Assessing Officer merely reproduced an investigation report without independent verification, the AO failed to apply his mind and the reassessment could not stand. The consequence is that reassessment proceedings initiated on the deficient reasons were quashed and the appellate decision in favour of the assessee was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1428 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343690</link>
      <description>Reopening an assessment under section 147/148 requires specific, verifiable reasons linking tangible material to a formed belief that income escaped assessment; the recorded reasons here were vague conclusions and therefore inadequate, so reopening was invalidated. Reasons of belief must state facts, their source and demonstrate independent evaluation; because the Assessing Officer merely reproduced an investigation report without independent verification, the AO failed to apply his mind and the reassessment could not stand. The consequence is that reassessment proceedings initiated on the deficient reasons were quashed and the appellate decision in favour of the assessee was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>