<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1419 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343681</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the penalty of Rs. 19,00,000/- levied under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal found that the disclosure made by the assessee was voluntary, without concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal concluded that there was no intentional act to conceal income, and the penalty was rightly deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 06:58:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1419 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343681</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the penalty of Rs. 19,00,000/- levied under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal found that the disclosure made by the assessee was voluntary, without concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal concluded that there was no intentional act to conceal income, and the penalty was rightly deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>