<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1417 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The penalty was found unsustainable due to ambiguity in the penalty notice and lack of clear findings by the AO regarding the nature of the offense. The decision was based on legal precedents emphasizing clarity in penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1417 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The penalty was found unsustainable due to ambiguity in the penalty notice and lack of clear findings by the AO regarding the nature of the offense. The decision was based on legal precedents emphasizing clarity in penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>