<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1413 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343675</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the assessing officer to delete the addition of deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e). The Tribunal found errors in treating various transactions as a single loan and set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order, instructing the AO to reassess the case. The decision implied a reevaluation of the income tax demand and emphasized the need for a comprehensive review based on detailed examination of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 06:58:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1413 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343675</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the assessing officer to delete the addition of deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e). The Tribunal found errors in treating various transactions as a single loan and set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order, instructing the AO to reassess the case. The decision implied a reevaluation of the income tax demand and emphasized the need for a comprehensive review based on detailed examination of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>