<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1411 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the classification of the assessee trust as an indeterminate trust, taxing interest income in the hands of the assessee, and deeming the disallowance of 50% of management expenses reasonable. The decision underscored the significance of meeting specific criteria for trusts to qualify for &quot;pass-through&quot; status and the requirement of clear beneficiary identification in trust deeds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1411 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the classification of the assessee trust as an indeterminate trust, taxing interest income in the hands of the assessee, and deeming the disallowance of 50% of management expenses reasonable. The decision underscored the significance of meeting specific criteria for trusts to qualify for &quot;pass-through&quot; status and the requirement of clear beneficiary identification in trust deeds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>