<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the gift received from the HUF is exempt under sections 56(2)(vi) and 10(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow consequential relief regarding interest charged under sections 234B and 234C. The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was deleted as the Tribunal found no basis for it to stand after deleting the quantum addition, thereby dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the gift received from the HUF is exempt under sections 56(2)(vi) and 10(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow consequential relief regarding interest charged under sections 234B and 234C. The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was deleted as the Tribunal found no basis for it to stand after deleting the quantum addition, thereby dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>