<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 341 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deleted the Rs. 51,000 addition sustained by the CIT(A) due to lack of evidence and improper reliance on uncorroborated statements. The deletion of Rs. 2,25,000 by the CIT(A) was upheld as the addition was based on conjecture without evidence. The deduction of Rs. 74,372 for salaries and 1/3rd of the manager&#039;s salary was upheld to maintain consistency with past assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 16:51:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 341 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deleted the Rs. 51,000 addition sustained by the CIT(A) due to lack of evidence and improper reliance on uncorroborated statements. The deletion of Rs. 2,25,000 by the CIT(A) was upheld as the addition was based on conjecture without evidence. The deduction of Rs. 74,372 for salaries and 1/3rd of the manager&#039;s salary was upheld to maintain consistency with past assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>