<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1401 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07. The penalties were deemed unjustified due to defective notices and income estimation without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal reversed the orders of the CIT(A) and AO, directing the deletion of penalties for both years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 06:11:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1401 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07. The penalties were deemed unjustified due to defective notices and income estimation without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal reversed the orders of the CIT(A) and AO, directing the deletion of penalties for both years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>