https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343659 A writ challenge to reassessment orders under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was treated as premature because the statute provided an appellate remedy. Rule 24 of the Bihar VAT Rules, 2005 was read to require notice, an opportunity to object, and recorded reasons, but not a separate personal hearing in the form claimed by the petitioner. As the record showed notices, appearance through counsel, filed objections, and hearing of counsel, the material did not establish ex parte action or a clear breach of natural justice. The grievance could be pursued before the appellate authority, so writ jurisdiction was not to be invoked at that stage. en-us Wed, 10 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343659 A writ challenge to reassessment orders under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was treated as premature because the statute provided an appellate remedy. Rule 24 of the Bihar VAT Rules, 2005 was read to require notice, an opportunity to object, and recorded reasons, but not a separate personal hearing in the form claimed by the petitioner. As the record showed notices, appearance through counsel, filed objections, and hearing of counsel, the material did not establish ex parte action or a clear breach of natural justice. The grievance could be pursued before the appellate authority, so writ jurisdiction was not to be invoked at that stage. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 10 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343659