<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (9) TMI 7 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7992</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the amendment by the Finance Act, 1969, to include agricultural land in computing net wealth under the Wealth-tax Act was beyond Parliament&#039;s competence and unconstitutional. The writ petition by the private person challenging the amendment was accepted, ruling it unconstitutional. However, the High Court dismissed the State of Punjab&#039;s petition for lack of jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (9) TMI 7 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7992</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the amendment by the Finance Act, 1969, to include agricultural land in computing net wealth under the Wealth-tax Act was beyond Parliament&#039;s competence and unconstitutional. The writ petition by the private person challenging the amendment was accepted, ruling it unconstitutional. However, the High Court dismissed the State of Punjab&#039;s petition for lack of jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>