<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1389 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343651</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the demand for service tax on construction activities was not valid under relevant provisions. The appellant was granted consequential benefits as the show cause notice and demand were deemed unsustainable and against the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1389 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343651</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the demand for service tax on construction activities was not valid under relevant provisions. The appellant was granted consequential benefits as the show cause notice and demand were deemed unsustainable and against the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>