<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1385 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that goods cleared to exempted customers were eligible for exemption at the time of removal from the installation. No duty was deemed payable on the stock remaining at the installation post withdrawal of the warehousing facility for petroleum products, specifically Low Sulphur Heavy Stock (LSHS). The High Court supported this decision, emphasizing that exemptions for specific end-users continued even after the withdrawal of the warehousing facility, leading to the setting aside of the impugned orders and allowing the appeals of the appellant with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1385 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that goods cleared to exempted customers were eligible for exemption at the time of removal from the installation. No duty was deemed payable on the stock remaining at the installation post withdrawal of the warehousing facility for petroleum products, specifically Low Sulphur Heavy Stock (LSHS). The High Court supported this decision, emphasizing that exemptions for specific end-users continued even after the withdrawal of the warehousing facility, leading to the setting aside of the impugned orders and allowing the appeals of the appellant with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>