<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1381 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343643</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the decision that excise duty on inputs and notional profit would not be added to the assessable value of final products. The requirement for a Cost Accountant&#039;s certificate was set aside, and the matter was remanded to determine the correct value. The judgment clarified the treatment of excise duty and notional profit, emphasizing accurate cost calculations and the relevance of previous tribunal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 06:04:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1381 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343643</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the decision that excise duty on inputs and notional profit would not be added to the assessable value of final products. The requirement for a Cost Accountant&#039;s certificate was set aside, and the matter was remanded to determine the correct value. The judgment clarified the treatment of excise duty and notional profit, emphasizing accurate cost calculations and the relevance of previous tribunal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>