<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1380 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343642</link>
    <description>Gases that escaped into the atmosphere during the manufacturing process were not treated as manufactured products liable to central excise duty. The Tribunal followed its earlier ruling on the same issue and relied on a Board circular clarifying that gases falling under the relevant chapters and allowed to escape into the atmosphere were not dutiable. On that basis, it stated that the Revenue was bound by the circular, and the challenge to duty liability failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1380 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343642</link>
      <description>Gases that escaped into the atmosphere during the manufacturing process were not treated as manufactured products liable to central excise duty. The Tribunal followed its earlier ruling on the same issue and relied on a Board circular clarifying that gases falling under the relevant chapters and allowed to escape into the atmosphere were not dutiable. On that basis, it stated that the Revenue was bound by the circular, and the challenge to duty liability failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>