<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1379 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343641</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the disallowance of CENVAT credit of education cess and secondary &amp;amp; higher education cess on domestic clearance by a 100% Export Oriented Unit. The court distinguished between basic customs duty and additional duty equivalent to central excise duties, limiting CENVAT credit to central excise duties and cess thereof. The penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed to that limited extent, as there was no intent to evade duties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 06:04:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1379 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343641</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the disallowance of CENVAT credit of education cess and secondary &amp;amp; higher education cess on domestic clearance by a 100% Export Oriented Unit. The court distinguished between basic customs duty and additional duty equivalent to central excise duties, limiting CENVAT credit to central excise duties and cess thereof. The penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed to that limited extent, as there was no intent to evade duties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>