<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1368 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,14,45,953 made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the lower additional income declared in the return was justified as it included opening balances from the previous year. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifying details provided by the assessee before making additions based on search action declarations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 06:03:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1368 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,14,45,953 made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the lower additional income declared in the return was justified as it included opening balances from the previous year. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifying details provided by the assessee before making additions based on search action declarations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>