<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s claims for brokerage, electricity, legal and professional expenses, and bank charges, citing the specific and exhaustive nature of allowable deductions under sections 23 and 24 of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeal concerning the incorrect computation of interest income, directing the AO to verify and correct the figures based on the TDS certificates. The appeal was thus partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 08:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1357 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s claims for brokerage, electricity, legal and professional expenses, and bank charges, citing the specific and exhaustive nature of allowable deductions under sections 23 and 24 of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeal concerning the incorrect computation of interest income, directing the AO to verify and correct the figures based on the TDS certificates. The appeal was thus partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>