<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1539 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, as the penalty proceedings did not align with the grounds on which they were initiated. Emphasizing the necessity of consistency between the basis for penalty proceedings and the actual grounds for penalty imposition, the Tribunal quashed the penalty order citing legal precedents and principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 21:41:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1539 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, as the penalty proceedings did not align with the grounds on which they were initiated. Emphasizing the necessity of consistency between the basis for penalty proceedings and the actual grounds for penalty imposition, the Tribunal quashed the penalty order citing legal precedents and principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>