<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1400 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192402</link>
    <description>The governing legal principle from the cited precedents was held to bind the parties, and the genuineness of the transactions was to be examined in that light. The Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal was therefore not treated as the final word on the factual issue. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication on the factual matrix, with the declared legal position to be applied while testing whether the transactions were genuine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 21:41:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1400 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192402</link>
      <description>The governing legal principle from the cited precedents was held to bind the parties, and the genuineness of the transactions was to be examined in that light. The Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal was therefore not treated as the final word on the factual issue. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication on the factual matrix, with the declared legal position to be applied while testing whether the transactions were genuine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>