<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1203 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by directing the Assessing Officer to verify the availability of statements and supply them to the assessee. If the statements were not available, no addition should be made. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s estimation of a 10% disallowance for probable purchases from the grey market. The appeals were allowed as indicated, providing the assessee an opportunity to substantiate their claims and ensuring adherence to the principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 08:22:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1203 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by directing the Assessing Officer to verify the availability of statements and supply them to the assessee. If the statements were not available, no addition should be made. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s estimation of a 10% disallowance for probable purchases from the grey market. The appeals were allowed as indicated, providing the assessee an opportunity to substantiate their claims and ensuring adherence to the principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>