<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1346 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343608</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to drop demands raised in the second show cause notice, finding the invocation of the extended period beyond the limitation period and lacking new facts. Relying on legal precedents, the tribunal emphasized procedural compliance and time limitations in tax matters, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal and reinforcing the importance of consistency in invoking extended periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1346 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343608</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to drop demands raised in the second show cause notice, finding the invocation of the extended period beyond the limitation period and lacking new facts. Relying on legal precedents, the tribunal emphasized procedural compliance and time limitations in tax matters, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal and reinforcing the importance of consistency in invoking extended periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>