https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343584 The Court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the writs of demand and subsequent orders issued by the VATO for AYs 2006-07 and 2007-08. The Court found that demands were made far beyond the time period envisaged for fresh assessment proceedings, highlighting the failure to comply with time-bound directions and the necessity of proper assessment before raising tax, interest, or penalty demands. The Court emphasized the lack of action by the VATO in accordance with the law and failure to abide by the OHA's orders, leading to the decision to quash the demands and orders. en-us Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343584 The Court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the writs of demand and subsequent orders issued by the VATO for AYs 2006-07 and 2007-08. The Court found that demands were made far beyond the time period envisaged for fresh assessment proceedings, highlighting the failure to comply with time-bound directions and the necessity of proper assessment before raising tax, interest, or penalty demands. The Court emphasized the lack of action by the VATO in accordance with the law and failure to abide by the OHA's orders, leading to the decision to quash the demands and orders. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343584